Red Wing Shoes Oxford 3112 – the old 8103 ?

Red Wing Shoes Oxford 3112 – boxedRed Wing Shoes Oxford 3112 – unpackedRed Wing Shoes Oxford 3112 – side view,  Oro Russet Portage LeatherRed Wing Shoes Oxford 3112 – laces detailRed Wing Shoes Oxford 3112 – detail rim of the heelRed Wing Shoes Oxford 3112 – sole with red wing shoes logoRed Wing Shoes Oxford 3112 – red wing shoes logo on the soleRed Wing Shoes Oxford 3112 – id label inside the shoeRed Wing Shoes Oxford 3112 – insole and detail of the inside of the shoeRed Wing Shoes Oxford 3112 – heel and sole Red Wing Shoes Oxford 3112 – heel inside Red Wing Shoes Oxford 3112 – full view of the shoesRed Wing Shoes Oxford 3112 – top of the shoes lacesRed Wing Shoes Oxford 3112 – full view with original booklet Red Wing Shoes Oxford 3112 – the old 8103 ?:
Finally my first Red Wing Oxford, a 3112. I was close to 100% sure its a Red Wing 8103. The 3112 from 05/2005 in no longer produced as I could find out. The differences are the logo print on the heel of the shoe, the different pattern of the sole, the more cushioned rim of the heel,  the red red wing logo on the sole and thanks to Eric, only a single line of stitching not two for attaching the shoe with the soles. He also mentioned that this shoe is from the former working boots collection which was only available in the US.

The shoe is nearly new with the original box and the leaflets from red wing. For me it looks like this shoe was much more difficult to produce, except from the double line of stitches. So i´m still in decision to sell it and buy a 8103 in 10 1/2. Or to break this kind of deadstock shoe in.

Can someone please make some comment about a difference of the leather ?
Is it also a “Oro Russet Portage Leather” with the same thickness as the 8103?

About these ads

2 thoughts on “Red Wing Shoes Oxford 3112 – the old 8103 ?

  1. Thomas Bojer

    Hi Alex,
    Since find, eBay? I own a pair of 8103 and I must admit that I would love to have better cushion on the rim of the heel. Also, I think the leather is completely the same expect that these older production runs may be a bit more lined.
    So you would keep it!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s